Logo

Patients

Decorative Background Left
Decorative Background Left

A Safer, Faster, and Smarter Way to Heal

The Mizzo Endo 4000 robotic surgery system gives patients a new choice : minimally, invasive procedures powered by cutting-edge AI, robotics, and real-time imaging for better outcomes, less pain, and faster recovery.

  • A next-generation surgical robot assists surgeons with tiny, precise movements.
  • Uses 3D visualization, AI-guided imaging, and haptic feedback for the highest accuracy.
  • Designed for many types of soft-tissue surgeries, including cancer, general, gynaecological, and gastrointestinal procedures.
Surgical team

Here is a comparison of various features between Robotic, Laparoscopic & Open Surgery

Click on the various features below to Learn More

Robotic (Mizzo Endo 4000):

Tiny, most precise with 3D guidance

Laparoscopic:

Small, but limited instrument movement

Open Surgery:

Large cut, more tissue disruption

Why
Patients Choose
Mizzo Endo 4000

Faster Recovery:

Most return home in one day or less and resume daily activities sooner.

Minimal Pain:

Tiny incisions and less tissue damage reduce discomfort and painkiller use.

Safer Surgery:

Advanced imaging and robotics lead to fewer complications, infections, and readmissions.

Better Results:

Robotic precision is especially valuable for delicate, complex surgeries.

Access to Expert Care:

Built-in telesurgery allows specialists to guide your surgeon remotely if needed, wherever you live.

Click any of the Cards to learn more

Types of
Surgeries
Urology
Gynecology
General Surgery
Bariatric Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
GI and HPB
Other Surgeries

Choose the section that best fits your needs

Whether you are a customer with questions or a distributor interested in partnership opportunities, we're here to help.

Customers

Citation

  • Rivero-Moreno Y, et al. “Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Benefits, Limitations, and Future Directions.” Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42602. doi:10.7759/cureus.42602. [Cites smaller scars, reduced postoperative complications, improved outcomes].

  • Reddy K, et al. “Advancements in Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Roadmap for Future Research.” Cureus. 2023;15(12):e52789. doi:10.7759/cureus.52789. [Cites increased precision, faster recovery, less pain, fewer complications, enhanced patient comfort].

  • Dixit S, et al. “Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Surgery vs. Open Surgery: Current Evidence and Recommendations.” J Clin Med. 2024. [Reports enhanced postoperative pain management and greater comfort compared to open surgery].

  • Chiu LH, et al. “Comparison of robotic surgery and laparoscopy to perform total hysterectomies.” J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(6):932-938. doi:10.1111/jog.12750. [Reports lower postoperative pain and favorable short-term surgical outcome with robotics].

  • Kalata S, et al. “Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic General Surgery Procedures.” JAMA Surgery. 2023;158(9):781–789. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2841. [Shows reduced conversion rates to open surgery and shorter hospital stays in robotic cohorts].

  • Lai TJ, et al. “Clinical effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic and open approaches: systematic review.” BMJ Open. 2024;14(9):e076750. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076750. [Demonstrates comparable or improved clinical and recovery outcomes].